Day 28: For the final day, it's Amphicoelias fragillimus, the dinosaur that may or may not have existed. Back in the 19th century, two Americans, Edward Drinker Cope and Othniel Charles Marsh, were embroiled in a decidedly unfriendly race to discover the most dinosaur bones. They had spies in each other's camps, and were at pains to ridicule each other's mistakes at every opportunity - and, given that their rivalry caused them to rush the business of finding and naming new dinosaurs, there were quite a few mistakes. In the midst of all of this, Edward Drinker Cope found a vertebra which, if his measurements were correct, would have belonged to an absolutely massive dinosaur, far bigger than anything found to this day. Due to the close scrutiny from Marsh, we can be sure that he didn't make up his discovery. That would have been professional suicide. It has been suggested, however, that during the hurry to write up his notes, he may have misplaced a digit, accidentally inflating the size of his find.
Argentinosaurus huinculensis is generally held to be the biggest dinosaur, reaching around thirty-five metres in length. Amphicoelias fragillimus (the second name refers to the very fragile condition of the fossil) is estimated to have been some fifty-eight metres long. Whether it could even have walked is a reasonable question! Nobody doubted Cope though. He had too much to lose to lie. Unfortunately, due to the sheer volume of fossils discovered in his race with Marsh, many remained in boxes for later examination, often for a long time - and Amphicoelias was fragile. By the time anybody went looking for it, it had disappeared, either because it had fallen apart, or because - due perhaps to an error in Cope's notation - it was overlooked, since it wasn't nearly as big as expected. Unless more is found (and people do keep looking - it's something of a Holy Grail, at least amongst those who still believe), we shall probably never know.
So there you have it - the maybe dinosaur. If it did live, it would have been in Colorado in the late Jurassic (some 150 million years ago), and would have been an herbivorous sauropod (think very, very big Diplodocus). Did it? Didn't it? Probably not, in all honesty, but it's a nice thought!
*****
To finish, two new dinosaurs, both announced this month: Bajadasaurus pronuspinax and Moros intrepidus. The first is another sauropod, with some rather fetching spikes. Bajadasaurus lived in the early Cretaceous (c. 140 million years ago), in Argentina, and is quite rare amongst sauropods in that it has been found with its skull mostly intact. Sauropods were basically giant, digesting machines. All the important stuff went on in the body, and the head was a small thing, with fairly rubbish teeth, which grabbed stuff and swallowed it. Consequently they don't tend to last well, and most sauropods are found headless.
Moros intrepidus was a tyrannosaur, from the later Cretaceous (c. 96 million years ago), in Utah. The most famous tyrannosaur is, of course, Tyrannosaurus rex, a giant predator from the end of the Age of Dinosaurs. Not all tyrannosaurs were so big, particularly earlier on in their development, and Moros was a tiddler in comparison to its later relatives. It would have been very fast though, and whilst smaller than later tyrannosaurs, it was bigger than its predecessors. A step on the road to T. rex then perhaps. And, in the meantime, plenty big enough to bite your head off!
Argentinosaurus huinculensis is generally held to be the biggest dinosaur, reaching around thirty-five metres in length. Amphicoelias fragillimus (the second name refers to the very fragile condition of the fossil) is estimated to have been some fifty-eight metres long. Whether it could even have walked is a reasonable question! Nobody doubted Cope though. He had too much to lose to lie. Unfortunately, due to the sheer volume of fossils discovered in his race with Marsh, many remained in boxes for later examination, often for a long time - and Amphicoelias was fragile. By the time anybody went looking for it, it had disappeared, either because it had fallen apart, or because - due perhaps to an error in Cope's notation - it was overlooked, since it wasn't nearly as big as expected. Unless more is found (and people do keep looking - it's something of a Holy Grail, at least amongst those who still believe), we shall probably never know.
So there you have it - the maybe dinosaur. If it did live, it would have been in Colorado in the late Jurassic (some 150 million years ago), and would have been an herbivorous sauropod (think very, very big Diplodocus). Did it? Didn't it? Probably not, in all honesty, but it's a nice thought!
To finish, two new dinosaurs, both announced this month: Bajadasaurus pronuspinax and Moros intrepidus. The first is another sauropod, with some rather fetching spikes. Bajadasaurus lived in the early Cretaceous (c. 140 million years ago), in Argentina, and is quite rare amongst sauropods in that it has been found with its skull mostly intact. Sauropods were basically giant, digesting machines. All the important stuff went on in the body, and the head was a small thing, with fairly rubbish teeth, which grabbed stuff and swallowed it. Consequently they don't tend to last well, and most sauropods are found headless.
Moros intrepidus was a tyrannosaur, from the later Cretaceous (c. 96 million years ago), in Utah. The most famous tyrannosaur is, of course, Tyrannosaurus rex, a giant predator from the end of the Age of Dinosaurs. Not all tyrannosaurs were so big, particularly earlier on in their development, and Moros was a tiddler in comparison to its later relatives. It would have been very fast though, and whilst smaller than later tyrannosaurs, it was bigger than its predecessors. A step on the road to T. rex then perhaps. And, in the meantime, plenty big enough to bite your head off!
Tags: